Posts for category ‘movies’

December 7, 2011
in my stocking this year, please: creative cajones

Over this past weekend, we watched The Fantastic Mr. Fox. Which was great. And I sat there imagining the moment Wes Anderson came up with the idea to adapt the Roald Dahl story into stop-motion puppet animation. And all of the things I would have said to myself, were I him. Like:

That sounds really hard.

I don’t know anything about stop-motion animation.

There’s not really a place for it on the market; it doesn’t fit into any viably marketable category.

No one will like it.

No one will back it.

People will think I’m weird.

I should just make Rushmore again.

But if he had any of those thoughts, he made the movie anyway. (Against obstacles.) And it’s delightful. It’s so totally out there in some ways, and in other ways so recognizably his work. You can see it in the way objects and music and even the puppets’ clothing evoke that Wes Anderson mood. Or maybe it’s the objects and music and clothes that are themselves the beginnings of what Anderson seeks to create. Definitely a Wes Anderson movie in any case. But still, it seems to me it was probably a big risk.

Which inspired me.

I want to be the kind of creative person who is not scared off by possibly-crazy ideas and doesn’t smother every spark and crackle with a host of “yeahbut”s and “ifonly”s. Now that I’m in my forties (or, as a woman I sat next to at a dinner recently said to me, “the [eff]-you forties”), I’d like the kind of creative nuts, rocks, balls, stones–and the accompanying work ethic–that lead to cool stuff like Mr. Fox.

And that movie is just one example of what I’m talking about. Same goes for anything that doesn’t fit into an obvious slot in “The Marketplace,” which sometimes can feel like the mortal enemy of true creative passion as publishers, production companies, record companies, and TV studios wring their hands over the bottom line.

Sometimes I wish we lived in the days when it was a given that artists and writers would not be making a living without a patron. You went into it knowing it was all about fingerless gloves, lumps of coal, and slaving over candle stubs as you contracted consumption before dying in obscurity. You knew you were doing it because you could do no else, not because you might be able to quit your day job and get more time to tweet.

But, that’s a bit ungrateful and distorted. Like wishing for “simpler times” when actually slaves and women were doing all the work and there was no such thing as antibiotics.

I’m very glad to be making my living as a writer, and know how fortunate I am to do so, and believe artists should be paid. I just don’t want to cling to my situation so tightly that I forget to make at least some choices based on passion and joy and the desire for adventure, growth, challenge. To take a chance now and then.

One piece of advice I got a lot when I was starting out was that I should treat writing like a job, like a business. I understand the spirit behind that advice, and there are ways it’s wise. And yet…I don’t know. Because after over five years of treating it like a job, guess what it feels like? Often the fearful, bill-paying, Business Minded Sara is in danger of completely taking over. And that makes me more than a little sad.

But – hope!

If there’s one unifying theme to the upcoming year, it’s that I’m working on changing things that I’d like to be different. (I know. Innovative!) Maybe there will be a kind of Mr. Fox in my future, in my eff-you forties, or my fabulous fifties. Or sordid sixties. Or sexy seventies. It’s never too late, or–as I more often need to remind myself–too soon.

Bookmark and Share
September 22, 2011
An opportunity to revisit some fundamental story things

Last night we went to this Open Screen night at the Tower, sponsored by the Salt Lake Film Society. It was like open mic, but with short films, up to ten minutes. It was a fun, free date night. It’s not like I expected Sundance quality or anything, but I found myself a teeny tiny bit let down by the films. And I got to thinking about the overlap between problems with these short films and the problems I often see in manuscripts in workshop settings. Yes, including my own, at early stages. To wit:

- Lack of a sense of story. What’s the story? What’s at stake, and why should anyone care about it? What is there for the characters to gain or lose in this scenario? When I sit down to watch a film, no matter what the length and no matter what the style, I’m thinking, Tell me a story. True. Made up. Silent. Talkie. Artsy. Straightforward. Whatever.

- Lack of a point of view. Through whose eyes am I experiencing this? What or who am I supposed to latch onto as I watch, to help with the aforementioned caring about what’s happening? Give me an entry point, take my hand, escort me into things. You don’t have to be condescending or spoon-feed, but at least hold out an open hand. There’s a Let me show you what I see element that I think should accompany the storytelling process.

- Lack of substance.  A lot of the films had great style. Really great style. You could see the filmmakers had invested a lot of time and energy in setting up creative shots, doing some cool editing, adding in some neato effects. But…what’s all the blood, sweat, and tears for if you don’t kinda have something to say? I know this “something to say” thing is highly subjective, and I’m not talking about a message or an agenda. But the deeper your level of thought in the process, the deeper the viewing/reading experience will be. Even something purely for entertainment should compel.

Okay, maybe I’m overthinking a for-fun venture. But I wouldn’t be me if I didn’t overthink, and it’s easier than doing my own work…

Happy writing until I see you here again next week!

Bookmark and Share
July 29, 2011
Hopes for my weekend, in pictures and song.

Bookmark and Share
April 29, 2011
A Friday Five

1. I am soooooooper duper excited to be able to announce that I’ll be joining the Smart Chicks Kick It Tour 2.0 this fall, masterminded by the fabulous trio of Melissa Marr, Kelley Armstrong, and Jennifer Lynn Barnes. I’m confirmed for Portland and Vancouver, with a very likely Seattle immediately following. You can follow the Smart Chicks tour on twitter (@smartchickstour), by liking the Facebook page, and watching the web site. (Warning: I did not have to take an IQ test to be part of the tour, so my actual smartness is not guaranteed.)

2. My latest Good Letters post, about words v. presence, is up.

3. Is the royal wedding over yet?

4. A couple of recent good interviews for those of you interested in the connections between arts/faith/culture in the movies: Jeffrey Overstreet interviews one of my creative heroes, Tom McCarthy (Win Win, which is great, btw). And Relevant Magazine interviews one of my favorite actors, Mark Ruffalo, about his directorial debut, Sympathy for Delicious.

5. Last night while driving over to the King’s English for Emily Wing Smith’s event, I passed what looked like a house party given by high schoolers, or maybe young college kids. I caught them somehow at a moment of mass happiness. It was warmish last evening, springlike, and they were in front on skateboards, or hugging one another, laughing, a pure-joy-smile on each of their faces. And I thought, yeah, in spite of it all, life–or living, anyway–truly is good. Better than the alternative.

Have a great weekend.

Bookmark and Share
March 29, 2011
watching and listening

My last couple of posts have been long and somewhat serious. I’m ready to loosen up, y’all! And shorten’ up! And so, loosely and succinctly:

- Thank you for your many and wonderful comments on the interview with Sara Bennett Wealer, and congrats to our winner, Lara D. If you did not win, please remember that this book is available for sale. Want awesome books to continue to be published? Buy awesome books. Realism, especially, can always use your vote. And by your vote I mean your money.

- My latest post at Good Letters is about re-reading Madeleine L’Engle’s House Like a Lotus, a hugely important read to me in my adolescence. Polly/Poly O’Keefe + older man! Was it a coincidence that not long after reading it I started dating a 25-year-old? Perhaps, perhaps not.

- I’ve started watching this neat little TV show called Lost. You probably haven’t heard of it. I’m kinda indie that way. Anyway, there was one day last week that sucked prettttty bad, and friend Mike said watching this show might help. Mike=genius.

- Have you seen Fish Tank? I’m not recommending watching it on a sucky day, unless you like to go all the way down the hatch while you’re at it, but for me it was one of the most compelling movies about a teen character I’ve seen in a long, long time. Hard to watch. You’ve been warned. (It reminded me a tiny tiny bit of Girls Town, this odd movie from long-ish ago that is not yet on DVD…)

- Some music I’ve been loving: Ivan & Alyosha, Say Hi, Girl Talk, and still Junip. Fun iTunes game! Broken Bells’ “The High Road” is listed as number one in my Top 25 Most Played at 116 plays. I don’t know if that’s for all time, or what, and that it probably doesn’t include iPod plays. I do know I listened to that song and album incessantly while writing How to Save a Life. It’s a great song, and part of what I loved was the lyric at the end (accompanied by gorgeous harmonies), “It’s too late to change your mind / you let loss be your guide.” But guess what? THOSE MIGHT NOT BE THE ACTUAL LYRICS. Many web sites insist they are saying “laws” not “loss.” I do not care. “Loss” goes with my book. “Laws” does not. It’s not the most exciting video in the world but there you go.

What’s your #1 most played song right now?

Bookmark and Share